NPS Carol Shivley Black History Museum 9_15

“Lives of Color:  1850-1900” – A Panel Discussion with the National Park Service

by Roberta L. Chew

The second event held on September 29, 2015 of our series commemorating the 50th Anniversary of the 1965 Immigration & Nationality Act and the Civil Rights Movement featured participants from the National Park Service.  The masthead on our 1882 Foundation website and 1882 Symposium Facebook page features two Chinese men who fought in the American Civil War, Joseph Pierce (left) and an elderly Edward Day Cohota (center).  The two soldiers were among an estimated three hundred Asians and Pacific Islanders who fought on both sides of the conflict.  They had come from twenty-five different countries to America.  Some are hard to find and research because of their Anglicized names.

Carol Shively edited the new NPS publication titled, “Asians and Pacific Islanders and the Civil War,” one of a series of books issued in commemoration of the 150th Anniversary of the Civil War.  Joseph Pierce was born in Canton.  At age ten, he allegedly was sold for six silver dollars and brought to Connecticut by a ship’s captain, Amos Peck, and raised by his family.  His Chinese name is unknown.  He was given the name Pierce because Franklin Pierce was then president of the United States.

Responding to President Lincoln’s call for Union volunteers, Joseph Pierce signed on with Company F, 14th Connecticut Volunteer Infantry in July 1862.  After only a month of training, he fought at the Battle of Antietam, the single bloodiest battle of the Civil War.  He also fought at Gettysburg and Petersburg.  After the war, Pierce returned to Meriden, CT, became an engraver, married and raised a family.  In 1894, when the law required him to register as a “Chinaman,” he cut his queue and listed his birthplace as Japan.  He never told his daughters he was Chinese.

San Francisco-born Irving Moy became interested in Corporal Joseph Pierce and researched him extensively.  He traced Pierce’s genealogy and found his five great-granddaughters.  Moy shared with them his research about their ancestor’s courageous past.  They had known nothing of his true identity and military service.  Irving Moy volunteers as a JoseCivil-war_joseph_pierceph Pierce re-enactor with Company F, 14th Connecticut Volunteer Infantry at Civil War commemorative events.

Edward Day Cahota was another Chinese boy brought to New England by a ship’s captain, Sargent Day, on a ship named Cahota.  In February 1864, Cahota enlisted in Company I, 23rd Massachusetts Voluntary Infantry.  He fought in the Battle of Drewry’s Bluff near Richmond, Virginia, and again at the Battle of Cold Harbor where he saved the life of a badly wounded comrade.  Cohota left the army, then re-enlisted repeatedly becoming a career soldier, despite marriage and family.  Although he had served his adopted country for 30 years, he was denied U.S. citizenship.  Cohota went to Washington, D.C., to appeal to his House representative and to a House committee.  They looked in vain for a statute that would allow him to claim citizenship.   Despite this, every evening an elderly Cohota unfailingly stood at attention at the lowering of the American flag at the veterans home where he lived during his final years.

Thanks to the efforts of Representative Mike Honda of California, some measure of recognition was finally achieved for these long forgotten soldiers when House Resolution 415 was adopted in July 2008.  The resolution recognized and expressed appreciation for the courageous and loyal contributions made by soldiers of Asian and Pacific Islander descent during the Civil War, and honored by name two of them, namely Joseph L. Pierce and Edward Day Cohota.

On the panel with Carol Shively, Ted Alexander, National Park Service Historian at Antietam National Battlefield, provided additional insights and descriptions of Chinese in the both sides of the Civil War.   “Most don’t know that a few hundred Asians served the Union cause in the Civil War,” said Alexander.  “Even fewer know that Chinese lived in the south and some joined the Confederate Army.”

According to Alexandria, Chinese arrived in the south in the 1840s and 1850s.  They had disembarked at the major southern ports – Baltimore, Charleston and New Orleans.  Some moved inland to settle in places like Louisville, Kentucky, and existed in pockets of Chinese here and there in the south.

The Chinese were not numerous.  They came in groups or individually.  There was confusion over how to regard them.  They were neither black nor American Indian nor white.  Census designations varied.  In some places they were considered “mulatto” or mixed race.  The Chinese were most prominent in Louisiana, particularly in New Orleans, where they were classified as white.  They were craftsmen – cigar makers, kite makers.  Today’s famous French Quarter was once the site of Chinatown.  Perry Lee, Jefferson Parish sheriff grew up in New Orleans’s Chinatown.

Chinese in the Confederacy included Siamese twins Chang and Eng Bunker who traveled with P.T. Barnum.  They prospered and settled in Mt. Airy, North Caro1302w775lina where they owned two farms, slaves and married two white sisters with whom they had more than twenty children.  Two of them – cousins – Christopher and Stephen Bunker, joined the 37th Virginia Cavalry Battalion a year apart.  Christopher was at the July 1864 burning of Chambersburg, Pennsylvania under the command of Gen. McCausland.  Chambersburg was the only northern town destroyed by Confederate forces.  Wounded at Moorefield, West Virginia, Christopher was captured, sent to prison at Camp Chase in Ohio and later released to return home.

Alexander also mentioned the Avegno Zouaves, a Confederate Louisiana unit with a mixture of nationalities.  Their colorful uniforms with red baggy pants emulated the style of French colonial units called Zouave in North Africa.  Chinese may have served with the Zouaves or they may have been Filipinos or mixed race Filipinos called  “Manilamen.”  These were originally Filipino sailors who jumped ship in New Orleans and settled in Louisiana’s bayous.

After the war, plantation owners brought Chinese to the South to replace slaves in the cotton fields and to build railroads in Louisiana and Texas.  At a Chinese Labor Convention held in Memphis, Tennessee in 1869, Gen. Nathan Bedford Forrest pledged $5000 to bring in 1,000 Chinese workers.  However, Frederick Douglass railed against such a proposal, saying, “the Chinaman will not long be willing to wear the cast off shoes of the negro, and if he refuses, there will be trouble again.”  Some Chinese initially came and worked in the fields.  But they soon moved on, becoming craftsmen and opening small businesses such as grocery stores.  The Chinese migrants did not become an alternative labor force on plantations, but for those who came and settled in places such as Cleveland, Mississippi, their legacy remains in the small businesses and communities they founded.

For more information, see Asians and Pacific Islanders and the Civil War, the Official National Park Service Handbook, 2015.

 

 

Books and Ideas: A Nation of Nations: A Great American Immigration Story

Check out Jay Roberts’s blog post for his first look at longtime NPR journalist Tom Gjelten’s new book, A Nation of Nations:  A Great American Immigration Story.  Go to:  http://1882foundation.orgjay.typepad.com/william_jay/2015/09/a-nation-of-nations-.html

 Passed 50 years ago, the 1965 Nationality Act allowed people to immigrate to the United States from around the globe who previously had been unwelcomed.  Gjelten details the history of anti-Chinese legislation and restrictions on Chinese immigration in particular.

One of the last pieces of legislation passed during the Civil Rights era, President Lyndon Johnson and the bill’s supporters did not foresee how much this law would change the demographics of the country and move it along the path of multiculturalism.  It complements the 50th anniversary events marking the 1965 Immigration Act and the Civil Rights Movement being held at the Alexandria Black History Museum, September 26-October 3.

A Nation of Nations cover

For information about the Alexandria events, go to: http://1882foundation.orgblackhistorymuseumevents.weebly.com

hart-celler.jpg (180×180)December 17: A Date to Remember

December 17 should be a day of remembrance and celebration.  This was the date that the Chinese exclusion laws were repealed in 1943, sixty years after the 1882 act barred Chinese from immigrating to the United States or becoming American citizens.  Congress took this action primarily as a war tactic.  It had very little to do with Congress recognizing it had wrongly targeted the Chinese or wanted them to be included in the American community.  President Roosevelt’s signing statement made that clear:  The exclusion laws were an “unfortunate barrier between allies.”  With its removal “the war effort in the Far East can now be carried on with a greater vigor and a larger understanding of our common purpose.”   And, to seal the point, legal immigration for Chinese was limited to 105 people per year.

It took another quarter of a decade, for Congress to enact an immigration bill that equably welcomed Chinese to the United States.  This was the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, also known as the Hart-Celler Act.  The act profoundly affected the Chinese American community.  It allowed legal migration to meet decades of frustrated demands and gave thousands of forced bachelors and separated families hope for a normal future.  The act also altered the entire demographic picture of America.  Enacted as part of the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960’s, it confirmed that immigration was as much a civil rights matter as it was about people coming to the United States.  Ethnic and cultural diversity in America became in reality a valued strength.

That said, it would be another 50 years, before Congress admitted –in two unanimously approved resolutions in 2011 and 2012 through the 1882 Project led by the Chinese American Citizens Alliance and four national partners –that what Congress did in 1882 was wrong.  People should never have been subjected to the laws that the 1882 Exclusion Act imposed upon the Chinese and that were extended to Asians by the Asiatic Zone of Exclusion.   Affirmed in the 2011/12 resolutions, Congress had a duty then, as it does today, to protect the civil rights of all people in the United States.

That Congress did not protect the Chinese historically and may falter again for another ethnic or religious group can be understood in the context of presidential politics.  As revealed in Forbidden Citizens by Martin Gold from his research for the 1882 Project, fierce competition for electoral votes created the forces that made increasingly harsh laws inevitable and harmfully lasting.  A lesson from the Chinese Exclusion Laws is that demagoguery and posturing for votes by candidates pandering to base fears and racism has no place in American politics.  But, if in place, it will take decades before consequences are resolved.

There are plenty of vexing issues today that require us and those who seek to lead to keep their wits together.  When violent dangers confront us, efforts and statements that reaffirm our fundamental American values are not just about political correctness.  They are essential.  Instead, political campaigning has fed us assertions of shallow policies and calls for deadly use of power that consider those values to be acceptable collateral damage.

Donald Trump’s call for Muslim exclusion is Denis Kearney’s call for “The Chinese Must Go!”  Let us hope that presidential politics do not turn that call into laws that require a future December 17 to repeal. ##

 1882 Foundation Recognized in ChinaTed receiving award in GUZ

 The 1882 Foundation was among eight organizations from around the world to receive awards for their work promoting the history and culture of Overseas Chinese.  Other organizations included language, social services and community entities from Australia, Japan, Italy, and Malaysia.   The Chinese American Citizen Alliance’s Pedro Chan was also recognized for his work promoting the history of the WWII Flying Tigers.

The awards culminated a symposium on the preservation of Chinese culture organized by the Zhigong Party, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, China Radio International, and China International Broadcasting Network.  The one day seminar was held at the Guangzhou Academy of Socialism in Guangzhou.   Keynote speakers and panelists included Alhambra City Mayor Stephen Sham, Singapore Nanyang University Director of Chinese Heritage Center Zhou Min, and Fudan University historian Professor Ge Jianxiong.   Ted Gong, Executive Director for 1882 Foundation, accepted the award on behalf of the 1882 Foundation.  Below are his acceptance remarks in English and Chinese:

Comments at International Forum on Chinese Culture 

I want to thank the Guangzhou Zhrgong Party, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, China Radio International and China Internal Broadcasting Network for their recognition of the work the 1882 Project Foundation does.

Their support encourages us to continue telling the world that Chinese exclusion laws were enacted first in 1882, again in 1892, again in 1902…  and it was not until 2011 and 2012  (130 years later) did the U.S. Congress acknowledge the harm and violence and killings these laws justified.  This story of exclusion was being lost until the 1882 Project led a grass roots campaign to tell Congress that we –the descendants of peasants, farmers and workers from China– would not be forgotten.  Our stories will be told.

Importantly, regardless of being Chinese or American, there are lessons to learn from understanding what the Chinese exclusion laws were, how they come to be enacted historically, and their consequences to civil rights of all peoples in the United States then and today.

The 1882 Foundation does this through three initiatives:  1) Organizing an annual national conference in Washington DC of museums, historical societies and private/government agencies from around the U.S.;  2) Developing curriculum and teacher guides;  3) Collecting and sharing oral histories.

We have been doing this since 2012.  Each year, we have expanded.  What makes our effort difficult is the lack of a permanent central location to plan and carry out our projects and programs…  We need a museum or history center to sustain and grow our programs.

In Washington DC, there are museums for the many people and their cultures.  This is proper because we should memorialize their contributions to strengthening and enriching the American nation.  In DC, we have a museum for the American Indians.  We will open the African American Museum next year.  We will soon begin to study the building of a museum for Hispanic Americans.   But, there is nothing for Chinese Americans.   We need your support to establish such a museum in Washington DC.

In closing, I want to point out that, while I represent the 1882 Foundation, I also represent the Chinese American Citizens Alliance (Tongyuanhui同源会”).  This organization was formed in 1895 (almost a contemporary to the Zhrgongtang (致公堂)) to help the Chinese people in the United States.

Those people at that time came largely from here –from Guangdong, Szeyup ,  Toyshan…and for me, from Fayuan, ….  This is the heartland.   But, it also part of a larger common source that includes all of China, including Fujian, Shangdong, and Taiwan.   And, while my Chinese is terrible, it is comforting to know that the work we do in the 1882 Foundation over 8,000 miles away in America is recognized here by people whom I can say share a common root with me, who are “of the same language and same race.”  Tongwen, tongzhong 同文同種

Again, thank you for encouraging us to tell the stories of our people, to ensure their legacy of courage, struggle, sacrifice, perseverance and exploration continue. ##

Ted at GUZ 11_2015 (2)

首先,我要感谢致公黨廣州市委、廣東外語外貿大學、廣州傳媒控股有限公司和中國國際廣播電台國際台及華語中心..对1882基金会所从事工作的褒奖。

他们的支持鼓励我们继续向世人揭露排华法案的历史。这些排华法案从1882年首次颁布,又在1892年,1902年得到进一步确认。直到130年后的2011年和2012年,美国国会才承认这些法案带来的伤害、暴力和杀戮。排华法案这段历史渐渐被遗忘,直到1882项目领导的基层民众运动向国会宣告,我们——来自中国的农民和工人的后代——不会忘记。我们要让人们知道我们的经历。

重要的是,无论是中国人还是美国人,都要通过了解什么是排华法案,它们产生的历史背景,它们在当时和今天给所有美国人的民权带来的后果,以便从中吸取教训。

1882基金会通过三项活动来做到这点: 第一,组织每年在华盛顿召开的,有来自美国各地的博物馆从2012年以来,历史学会和私营或政府机构代表参加的全国性会议; 第二,开发课程和教师指南; 第三,收集和分享口述历史。

我们一直在进行这些活动,并且一年年扩大。我们觉得困难的是缺乏一个固定的工作场所来规划和执行我们的项目和活动……我们需要一个博物馆或历史中心来维持和扩展我们的活动。 在华盛顿,已经为许多种族和文化建了博物馆。这是合情合理的,因为我们应该纪念他们为增强和丰富美利坚国家所作的贡献。在华盛顿,已有美国印第安人博物馆。明年将开放非裔美国人博物馆。很快将开始讨论建造一个拉美裔美国人博物馆。但是却没有为华裔美国人的博物馆。我们需要大家的支持在华盛顿建立这样一个博物馆。 最后,我想指出的是,虽然我代表1882基金会,但同时也代表同源会(也称华裔美国公民联盟)。同源会成立于1895年,与致公堂几乎同一时代,目的是帮助在美国的中国人。 这些中国人当时大部分来自广东,四邑,台山,。。。和我的祖居地,花县。。。这些是中心地带。但是,这只是更大地区的一部分,那就是整个中国, 也包括了福建,山东,台湾。。。虽然我的中文很差,但感到欣慰是,知道我们1882基金会远在8000英里外的美国所做的工作能得到这里人们的褒奖,我可以说,因为这里的人和我同出一个根,正所谓“同文同种”。

再次感谢大家的鼓励,鼓励我们述说我们民族的故事,确保他们的勇气,奋斗,牺牲,执着和探索得到发扬光大。

谢谢诸位!##

 

thLinking Heritage, History and Immigration

Executive Director Ted Gong recently received a legacy award from the Tinner Hill Heritage Foundation. The Virginia foundation is dedicated to honoring and continuing the tradition of those who formed the first rural branch of the NAACP.   In receiving the award during the foundation’s gala dinner January 9, 2015, Gong gave the following remarks. His remarks bring together the Chinese American and African American stories and tie together pride in heritage, efforts at historical preservation and fundamental issues in today’s immigration debate.

Remarks for Tinner Hill Heritage Project, 1/9/15

I want to thank the Tinner Hill Heritage Foundation for this recognition. In view of the passion and hard work that you all have demonstrated (especially Nikki Graves and Ed Henderson), I don’t feel adequate to the honor. But I do very much appreciate this moment. Too often, in our efforts at historical preservation and programming, we keep to ourselves. Stove-piped within our own communities, we celebrate each rediscovered story, take pride in our unique heritages, and give them voices that are our own. We need to do this – other people should not be allowed to define us by deciding what is important in our history.

But there is that which binds us together as a single community. And, this recognition reminds us of what makes us Chinese Americans, African Americans, Jewish Americans, Irish Americans…. It is a shared belief that all persons are created equal, actualized by legally defined civil rights.

2015 is the fiftieth anniversary Voting Rights Act of 1965. It is also the fiftieth anniversary of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965. This Act profoundly impacted the Asian American community because it repudiated the racist assumptions and racist provisions embedded in every immigration act since the first comprehensive immigration reform in 1882. This was the Chinese Exclusion Act that prohibited Chinese from immigrating to the United States and deemed them unfit to become American citizens. Its exclusion provisions were expanded and extended to make all people “aliens ineligible for citizenship” from an “Asiatic Barred Zone” that stretched from modern day Korea through all of India and Pakistan to Turkey. This racism was finally denounced by Congress in 1965 –and that Congressional action was very much because of the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s.

Three acts (the Civil rights Act of 1964, Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Immigration and Nationality Act) were parts together that sought to ensure all people in the United States were equal regardless of race –equal in terms of opportunities and access to public services, equal in terms of political participation and governing, and equal in terms of who could become an American citizen and have a part of the American dream.

A danger we face in today’s immigration debates is the creation (and then unquestioned acceptance) of different “categories of people” within our borders, categories with different rights.   Citizens or not?   Green cards, with our without conditions. People who can or cannot get drivers licenses. Right to work, maybe.   Sanctuary city, yes or no? Can I take my child to a public health clinic and expect equal treatment for equal cost…or any treatment at all?   Can I walk to the corner store without being profiled, detained and deported without legal representation? Can the children of these people become Americans?

Sadly, these are not new questions.

The value of projects like the Tinner Hill Heritage project is that they preserve answers on how people dealt with these questions in the past to get us from there to here. Then, it is up to us to see and understand, so that we can move us from here to the more perfect union we have set as our goal.

So, it is with a great deal of honor and humility to be here in a celebration of heritage and history, and recognition of how our communities intersect as participants within a single community of civil rights.

Videos on Chinese Americans Defending the Nation

https://1882foundation.orgyoutu.be/ewgoHWyMW6o

 

https://1882foundation.orgvimeo.com/88290470

https://1882foundation.orgyoutu.be/9M3Y6OBs5jc

https://1882foundation.orgyoutu.be/qAUrZjSdyeE

©2026 1882 FOUNDATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.